Theory about Jack
Jul. 9th, 2007 01:38 pmOk, have just had a major brainwave about that spoiler about Jack from Last of the Timelords.
I've finally reconciled to myself the whole Jack = Face of Boe scene. While I've seen some wonderful discussion and stories about it being true, overall there's so many reasons why it's annoying, and contradicts previously established canon, both onscreen and offscreen (which always holds less weight, but still!). There's a list here, if you're curious.
So, if Jack isn't the Face of Boe, how to explain the end of LotTL? Some say it's a joke, a prank, Jack was nicknamed after the Face of Boe because his head was unusually large, but I've finally realised the truth...
Jack is the father of the Face of Boe!!!1!![1]
That's why the Face of Boe lives for billions of years, when the usual lifespan of his species is forty years, because his daddy is immortal. And it's Jack - he'd totally have sex with a giant head in a jar.
[1]or possibly the mother - we don't know who got Jack pregnant with, after all.
Am I onto something or what? Or has all the economics study (still gonna fail!) made me completely lose it?
I've finally reconciled to myself the whole Jack = Face of Boe scene. While I've seen some wonderful discussion and stories about it being true, overall there's so many reasons why it's annoying, and contradicts previously established canon, both onscreen and offscreen (which always holds less weight, but still!). There's a list here, if you're curious.
So, if Jack isn't the Face of Boe, how to explain the end of LotTL? Some say it's a joke, a prank, Jack was nicknamed after the Face of Boe because his head was unusually large, but I've finally realised the truth...
Jack is the father of the Face of Boe!!!1!![1]
That's why the Face of Boe lives for billions of years, when the usual lifespan of his species is forty years, because his daddy is immortal. And it's Jack - he'd totally have sex with a giant head in a jar.
[1]or possibly the mother - we don't know who got Jack pregnant with, after all.
Am I onto something or what? Or has all the economics study (still gonna fail!) made me completely lose it?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 03:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 04:22 am (UTC)No, really.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 02:02 pm (UTC)that's intense
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 05:42 am (UTC)LOVE.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 04:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 04:47 am (UTC)But yes, we need more of Jack flirting with everything (especially the Doctor).
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 04:59 am (UTC)*visualises* PRETTY.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 05:07 am (UTC)Of course, Ianto would win Fraser's heart by being able to make proper tea.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 05:14 am (UTC)I still haven't managed to watch the Torchwood discs. Because I am a twat. In my haste to get to the Tennant goodies on the second disc, I put the first one down somewhere and now can't find it! *sniffles*
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 05:19 am (UTC)I hope it turns up soon! Retrace your steps?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 05:24 am (UTC)If he knew where his hands were, I'd almost believe that theory! ;-) Actually to be fair, he's found his hands. Doesn't have a clue he has feet though.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 12:50 pm (UTC)But yay for disc finding! \o/
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 04:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 05:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 05:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 05:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 05:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 05:33 am (UTC)I've just started reading Who slash, it's all taking a bit of getting used to. I'll never look at the sonic screwdriver in the same way again.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 05:35 am (UTC)I'll never look at the sonic screwdriver in the same way again.
Ahahahaahahahaha! I bet!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 05:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 05:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 05:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 05:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 06:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 07:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 04:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 10:33 am (UTC)He so would! I like this theory!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 04:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 10:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 04:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 10:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 11:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 04:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 01:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 04:28 am (UTC)