erilyn: gabe and mikey's hips (pretty)
Seems we're changing government. This is probably for the best (my lack of enthusiasm might get me defriended, but I just don't really like any of the major political parties in Australia that much).

Didn't make it to work on Friday, but I figured going with my sister (and dad) to check out a unit was a pretty good excuse, and this was her second look and she made an offer. They didn't accept her first go, and she's upped it a bit (the place hasn't been on the market long). Apart from the fact that this means she'll move out *sad face*, I'm hopeful for her. But it's only two suburbs away.

I'm typing suprisingly well, given the amount of wine I've drunk. [livejournal.com profile] iibnf and I watched the new Futurama movie this afternoon and it was goooooood. Then she came out to dinner with my family, to the local Lebanese restaurant, which was also very good. So full of food still.

Partially because I've eaten three cupcakes today - [livejournal.com profile] iibnf baked (chocolately goodness to the max!), and while my old primary school failed to have a sausage sizzle [1] going at lunch when I voted, there was a cake stall when my parents went up early, and they bought the richest butteriest cupcakes I've ever eaten. Mmmm.

Things I am grateful for: I live in a country which makes us vote, and apart from running the gauntlet of people handing out how to vote cards (I'm not rude, I just don't want them), no one threatens me, or coerces me, or denies me the right to vote. I'm so lucky, and I just want to acknowledge that. The biggest hassle I face is parking.

[1] I nearly rioted on the spot. Voting without a sausage sizzle is undemocratic!!!

O Canada!

Jun. 18th, 2003 10:38 am
erilyn: gabe and mikey's hips (nick)
They are legalising same-sex marriage, only the third country to do so.
erilyn: gabe and mikey's hips (Default)
We now have a dvd player! A lovely Pioneer DV-355. It's not working terribly well yet, and we're running it through a converter, so I need to fiddle and experiment. And we got 5 free dvds with it, including Lilo and Stitch! The other 4 aren't that good, though I've never seen Quiz Show.

"The Block", the combo renovation/competition show, is surprisingly addictive. And the taller member of the gay couple (not sure if that is Gavin or Warren) is adorable in his bounciness and enthusiasm.

Current affairs programs like Today, Tonight and A Current Affair have gotten crappier than they used to be.

Everyone who disagrees with my opinions is wrong, and when I rule the world, it shall be better! And sparklier!

And I have a long, thoughtful post in my head about warnings and classifications on media, especially as related to children, but I don't have the coherence to expound on it at the length I really should. Inspired by an interesting and rambling (in ground covered) debate/conversation with [livejournal.com profile] eponymous.

In short, a) I'm against homosexuality being acceptable as a category along sex, violence, drugs, language that shows have warnings for, even though there is a segment of the community that would like it, as it would say that it is unacceptable to simply be gay, and all other warnings relate to actions or happenings, not people, so I don't feel that legally-mandated media content warnings can instutionalise prejudice against one segment of population;

b) I'm all for informing parents about content to help them, though this should not be taken as reducing their role in being ultimately responsible for what their children watch. Current classifications aren't terribly good in some ways (re: Jurassic Park being PG, while even the director admitted he wouldn't let his young children see it) and perhaps parents (and others) need to have access to more detailed information about content. There are organisations, normally right wing religious types who do this kind of review. Perhaps there should be a way though of helping inform parents on content without being pejorative about what is being listed. However, I'm not sure of an effective way to do this, and who would decide what needs to be warned for. The last thing I'd want is more censorship.

For instance, when I was babysitting, I watched a kids movie on tv with the two girls, about 10 and 7. Nice movie, "Little Princess" or something, where the kid's dad dies and so there's no money for her education, so the school teacher makes her a servant. Kids are fine with the not-nice stuff happening to kid, nothing too bad, everything's going ok, but in the middle of the movie, not-too-graphic scene of soldiers being gassed in trenches in WWI. That took some explaining, and the girls were quite unsettled by it.

Opinions welcome, particularly from people with kids, on classifications and warnings and stuff in media. (Personally, I'd like a product placement warning, a degrading-to-humanity-reality-show warning, and an Eddie McGuire warning.)

But for now, I'm going to go read the instruction manual.

Profile

erilyn: gabe and mikey's hips (Default)
erilyn

December 2015

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 6th, 2026 01:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios