a fandom doesn't equal source material
Oct. 4th, 2005 02:53 pmApparently there's a bit of backlash against all the Serenity/Firefly enthusiasm that's been escalating around fandom for a while ie people saying it put them off seeing the movie etc etc. And while I can understand it (who hasn't been put off something because people won't stop going on and on about it?), I find it sad. Fandom is about being enthusiastic, about sharing the squee. And while it can be over the top, I've also seen people react negatively to what I'd consider normal-level enthusiasm (I'm not just talking about FF fandom). If you can't deal with fans being fannish, why would you be involved with fandom?
Which links into when people get put off a show/movie/book/something because of the fandom. Fandom =/= source material, and parts of fandom do not make up the whole fannish experience. If you get put off something because you get sick of people talking/squeeing about it, or people you don't like are into it, or because the fandom seems wanky, you're not achieving anything but a) denying yourself something that you might enjoy and b) letting other people dictate your actions. Hell, I know I've done it, and regretted it. Fandom influences the way we experience source materials a lot, and not always in good ways. I came into both Sentinel and Professionals through fanfic, and was biased towards preferring both Jim and Bodie, because of the rampant Blair and Doyle worship that some parts of both fandoms had going. I developed a "I'm not interested" frame of mind regarding SGA earlier in the year, for various reasons, but when it started on tv here, I gave it a chance. Took me a while to really get into it, and it was first and foremost cause I liked having a fun sf show to watch again. If I hadn't checked it out, I'd have missed out on something I've come to enjoy a lot, both for the show and for the slash.
Mostly this is all self-directed musings, cause I've found fandom to be a mixed blessing at times (though the positives far outway the negatives), and I need to remind myself that it can be a good idea to step away from it at times and just enjoy something on it's own merits. Or something. I suspect I had a point but mislaid it somewhere...
Before I recently friended the useful
sga_newsletter comm, I never realised how popular the Sheppard/Weir pairing was (as there does seem to be a fair number of stories being posted). Hmmm, there are (to me) far more interesting het pairings on the show. Please note: I'm not saying the pairing is evil and that people who like it are stupid - I just don't get it, and am vaguely curious as to what the appeal is to those who do. Of course, it doesn't help that Weir often irritates me, but still, I just don't see their interactions lending themselves to pairing them up.
Of course, that probably just means they'll be canon shortly.
Which links into when people get put off a show/movie/book/something because of the fandom. Fandom =/= source material, and parts of fandom do not make up the whole fannish experience. If you get put off something because you get sick of people talking/squeeing about it, or people you don't like are into it, or because the fandom seems wanky, you're not achieving anything but a) denying yourself something that you might enjoy and b) letting other people dictate your actions. Hell, I know I've done it, and regretted it. Fandom influences the way we experience source materials a lot, and not always in good ways. I came into both Sentinel and Professionals through fanfic, and was biased towards preferring both Jim and Bodie, because of the rampant Blair and Doyle worship that some parts of both fandoms had going. I developed a "I'm not interested" frame of mind regarding SGA earlier in the year, for various reasons, but when it started on tv here, I gave it a chance. Took me a while to really get into it, and it was first and foremost cause I liked having a fun sf show to watch again. If I hadn't checked it out, I'd have missed out on something I've come to enjoy a lot, both for the show and for the slash.
Mostly this is all self-directed musings, cause I've found fandom to be a mixed blessing at times (though the positives far outway the negatives), and I need to remind myself that it can be a good idea to step away from it at times and just enjoy something on it's own merits. Or something. I suspect I had a point but mislaid it somewhere...
Before I recently friended the useful
Of course, that probably just means they'll be canon shortly.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 04:58 am (UTC)Cutting off the nose to spite the face.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 05:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 05:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 05:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 11:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 12:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 05:26 am (UTC)Maybe folks think that there's only so much to go around, and it's getting all used up on the wrong fandom? Whereas I tend to think it's the other way around--squee begets more squee. It's not limited, like money--it breeds, like joy.
Works that way for me anyway--when I'm feeling all excited about something, say the Boys' concert I saw, I'm much more likely to post excited stuff about SGA and whatnot. When I'm feeling sort of blah, I tend to feel blah about all my fandoms.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 05:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 05:46 am (UTC)I really don't understand how people being excited about a book/movie/whatever makes people go "ew", though I've actually experienced that myself already from a very close fan. A friend has refused now to see Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and Corpse Bride because (paraphrasing) "the people that watch it are the same people that shop at Hot Topic" type sentiment (which really sort of made me feel insulted, as she's obviously my friend, I saw CatCF and will see Corpse Bride and shop at Hot Topic occasionally, but I don't bother her.. so that confused me). She's also refusing to watch Serenity or even the series because of some reason I don't quite understand. It's all so weird. People are weird.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 05:59 am (UTC)And yes, your friend does sound baffling.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 05:48 am (UTC)*shakes fist*
no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 06:06 am (UTC)Tangentially, I nearly killed our HR manager when I told him I could do his job with much less stress than he does it - by responding to any complaint or issue with "cry me a river", "build a bridge", "get a life", or some other amusing catchphrases. I think he was a little too tempted to try it out...
no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 06:13 am (UTC)Ahahaha. Yeah, that would be me if I ever had such a job. I used to work food service and sometimes, just for fun, I would respond to requests (such as, "can I get a hamburger?") with "No. No, you cannot." It's a wonder that I ever managed to keep a job.
Also, your icon? Awesome.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 06:25 am (UTC)This icon's been in rotation a long time,
no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 10:00 pm (UTC)I see all the Sheppard and Weir scenes that they've had, particularly recently, but there's just no spark between them for me. I've been more taken by the small amounts of interaction Weir has had with Zelenka, or the slightly more with Major Lorne recently (mmmmm).
Guess I only want to see the team (Sheppard, McKay, Teyla and Ronon) in various combinations with each other *g*.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 02:48 pm (UTC)And there's actually more J/E in the last month or two...it was very difficult to find anything (het) among all the slash.
I don't know Lorne, but yeah, I can kinda see something with Zelenka. There is some fic around, but it isn't convincing me.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 03:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 03:59 am (UTC)And I'm with you on the Cameron thing. SHe annoys me.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 04:10 am (UTC)I'm not huge interested in either Teyla or Weir, I've never thought highly of the SG writers ability to write female characters well. Tori Higginson seems like so much fun, it's one of the reasons I'm sad that I find Weir so bland.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 04:19 am (UTC)I like Weir...but maybe I can see some of myself in her (and I'm bland).
no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 04:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 04:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 10:06 pm (UTC)And that was a hell of a run-on sentence.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 12:53 pm (UTC)But stuff like this? (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=3&entry_id=1077) Yeah, that's enough to turn me _completely_ off. I've been able to watch crazy HP/LotR/etc. fans from the fringes, and yes, their "enthusiasm," particularly when it turns borderline criminal or particularly insane, does turn me away from something I might try otherwise. Of course, the nutso Backstreet fans send me scurrying into my shell, as well. I'd rather die than be lumped in with the whackos who think they're engaged to Nick Carter because he waved to them from the tv once.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-06 04:05 am (UTC)